Editorial standards
How we research, write, and review everything published under the Blasto name.
Nothing publishes without review
Every guide is reviewed by a named clinician before it goes live, and the reviewer's name, credentials, and sign-off date appear at the top of the article. This is enforced in our publishing system, not just by policy: an article without a named reviewer cannot be published.
We cite our sources
Claims about treatment, medications, or outcomes are sourced to peer-reviewed research or guidance from professional bodies, and those sources are listed at the end of each article so you can check them yourself.
We say when we don't know
IVF outcomes vary enormously between individuals and clinics. Where the evidence is genuinely mixed or thin, we say so rather than rounding it into a confident answer.
Content is reviewed again as it ages
Guidance changes. Articles carry a last-reviewed date, and we re-check them against current guidance rather than leaving them to drift.
None of it is medical advice
Blasto is a tracking and support tool, not a medical device. Our content is informational and never a substitute for your own care team, who know your history and your protocol. See our Terms of Service.
Tell us if we got something wrong
If you spot an error, email support@moonsify.com and we'll correct it and note the change.